Comparison

Relay vs Cursor

Cursor is where you write code; Relay is what runs while you are not writing any. They compose more naturally than they compete — and a team can sensibly pay for both.

Facts checked against official docs on 2026-09-08

What Cursor is

Cursor, by Anysphere, is a commercial AI coding product: a desktop editor whose homepage calls it "your coding agent for building ambitious software", plus a headless CLI and hosted cloud agents. It uses the Open VSX extension registry and offers a one-click import of VS Code extensions, themes and keybindings. Cloud agents run in isolated VMs, clone from GitHub, GitLab, Azure DevOps or Bitbucket, and hand work back as merge-ready pull requests; self-hosted machines can move that tool execution into a customer’s own network. Cursor ships its own model, Composer 2.5, and Bugbot reviews pull requests.

Pricing: Hobby free, no credit card, "limited Agent requests" · Pro $20/mo · Pro Plus $60/mo · Ultra $200/mo · Teams $40/user/mo monthly or $32 annual, Premium $120/user/mo monthly or $96 annual · Enterprise custom. Every plan bundles model usage with on-demand overage billed in arrears; Cursor’s own guidance says daily agent users typically incur $60–$100/mo of usage and power users $200+. As of 2026-09-08.

Side by side

CursorRelay
What it isAn editor first, with a headless CLI (`-p/--print`, json and stream-json output, session resume) and cloud agents alongside it.A terminal harness only. No editor, no completion UI, and no plan to build one.
Bring your own keyYes, for five providers — OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Azure OpenAI and AWS Bedrock. Keys are sent to Cursor’s backend with every request because all requests route through Cursor’s servers for final prompt building, and on Teams and Enterprise a $0.25 per million token Cursor Token Rate applies on top of model API pricing.Yes, with no vendor in the request path. Your machine calls your provider directly.
Where the agent loop runsCursor’s. Even with self-hosted machines, "Cursor runs the agent loop, inference, and planning" while the worker handles editing, commands and code access.On your machine, in a process you can inspect and kill.
Unattended long runsLong-running agents launched as a research preview on 2026-02-12 for Ultra, Teams and Enterprise; cloud agents subscribe to the PRs they create and drive them to completion, fixing CI and addressing bot comments.`--autonomous` with declared budgets and completion gates that are your own shell commands.
Free tierHobby, with limited agent requests; no published request count.$0 forever for a local developer, with no usage limit imposed by Relay — your provider bills your tokens.
Compliance postureAIUC-1, ISO/IEC 27001:2022, ISO/IEC 42001:2023 and a SOC 2 Type II attestation.None published. If a certification is on your procurement checklist, this row is a reason to pick Cursor.

Where Cursor is the better tool

  • Tab completion and hunk-level diff review — the most-used thing in the product, used every minute, with no Relay equivalent at all.
  • It is the editor. Most teams will not leave VS Code or JetBrains, and asking them to is a bigger change than adopting a harness.
  • Cloud agents keep working when the laptop is shut. Relay’s local-only architecture will not, deliberately.
  • Compliance and procurement: three certifications and an attestation, against Relay’s none.
  • Bugbot reviews the pull request. Relay does not read your diff and form an opinion about it.
  • One bill that includes inference, which is genuinely simpler than holding and rotating a provider key.

The honest take

The tempting line here — "Cursor is the GUI, Relay is the terminal" — is false, and Anysphere would say so loudly. Cursor ships a headless CLI installed by one-line curl, with print mode, json output and session resume; it is not a GUI-only product. The honest difference is narrower: everything Cursor does routes through Cursor’s servers, including requests made with your own API key, and on business plans that routing carries a per-token rate on top of your provider bill. That is a reasonable trade for prompt assembly, routing and retries, and for many teams it is the right one. It is a bad trade if provider portability is a strategy rather than a preference, or if prompts and code must not transit a third party at all. On cost, be careful in both directions: $15 a seat plus your own API bill is not obviously cheaper than $32 a seat all-in, and any comparison that quotes the first number without the second is selling rather than informing.

Sources

Run the harness yourself — one command, your own model key, no account: curl -fsSL https://relayevals.com/harness/install.sh | bash. Quickstart · What is a coding agent harness? · Pricing